How to Build an inexpensive Vista PC (Aero Enabled)

This article was written on February 16th 2007. I’ve written an updated version of this article, which you can view by clicking here, it contains newer parts and better instructions on how to build your new PC. Please update your bookmarks accordingly and don’t forget to subscribe to my RSS feed.

[Edit 2/28/07] WOW…the digg effect, over 1000 diggs. Thanks for visiting my site. By the way, Dreamhost, my hosting provider has been keeping up…]. Also, thanks for all your comments and suggestions.

[Edit #2] Wow…made it to the front page of Gizmodo (click here to view it).

So with so many people out there saying that you need a very high end PC to run Windows Vista with Aero enabled (and so many misconceptions around Vista, I want to prove that you can build at around $500. At my office, I am running Vista with Aero Glass enabled on an old (4 year) system, I just installed a $58 video card PNY nVidia FX5200 256MB on my P4 2.66, 1Gb of RAM system.

I went out there and priced out a system (from Mwave.com, my favorite supplier), very decent in my opinion. Now you won’t be able to run the latest games out there smoothly, this is just to prove that you can take full advantage of Vista under a budget. All quality parts in my opinion and it all came out to $538.01 not including MS Vista Home Premium (which can be purchased here for $115, shipping and tax. Notice that all the parts aren’t the absolute minimum, nor the cheapest, I’m going for the “best-bang for the buck” factor.

Heres the breakdown of the system (prices don’t include tax)

Motherboard: Intel BOXD945GCCRL - $72.45. DDR2 667 memory capable. SATA 300. PCI-E and enough room for expansion.

Processor: Intel PENTIUM D 820 2.8GHZ - $88.9. Low-end, very fast and capable dual core processor.

Memory: KINGSTON VALUE RAM KVR667D2N5/1G - $75.60. Two of these sticks for a total of 2 GB. Good memory. Reliable (so far for me)

Video Card: MSI RX700SE-TD256E RADEONX700SE - $62.90. 256 Mb. DirectX 9.0. Plenty of power for everyday tasks and some light gaming.

Hard Drive: WD 250GB WD2500KS - $67.50. SATA300. 16MB. 7200RPM. Fast. Reliable. Plenty of space.

Case: ANTEC NSK4400. $61.05. Quality case. Plenty of room. Mini-ATX. 380-watt PSU

Optical Drive: SAMSUNG 18X SH-S183L. $37.90. SATA. Dual layer. Lightscribe. Fast and no messy IDE cable.

So there you have it. A very decent PC, built from quality parts, capable of running Vista (very well).

[Another Edit] - This does come with a PSU, a 380-watt one. And Vista isn’t $400. I suggest getting Home Premium for $115.

About J2:

Part-time geek. Snowboarder. RC Planes / Cars. Founder/CFO of Initialize IT, IT Based Company based in Los Angeles, CA. http://iitnow.com

Related Posts




39 Comments

  1. Brian
    Posted February 28, 2007 at 12:18 am | Permalink

    what about the cost of Vista?

    [edit by J2] - read the article…it says it Windows Home Vista Premium is $115 OEM

  2. NoOne
    Posted February 28, 2007 at 12:47 am | Permalink

    So:
    - prices don’t include tax,
    - prices don’t include Vista,
    - prices don’t include keyboard, mouse and screen.

  3. }{itman
    Posted February 28, 2007 at 1:51 am | Permalink

    well u can easily configure your PC to use all the features of Vista according to the above specifications…but this will not help any of the gamers..u will suffer frequent fps loss as compared to the same specification on XP…so its worthless buying fx5200 for such an expensive os…so in my opinion spend some more bucks and get nvidia 6+ series GPU

  4. Posted February 28, 2007 at 2:48 am | Permalink

    All this and no photo? :(

  5. Sengfeng
    Posted February 28, 2007 at 4:02 am | Permalink

    …and add another $400 for Vista Ultimate, and you\’re set!

    [edit by J2] - Vista Ultimate is $195 OEM

  6. decker holiday
    Posted February 28, 2007 at 4:16 am | Permalink

    mwave is ok but I like http://www.gamegiants.net the prices are better on most items in your list.

  7. Posted February 28, 2007 at 4:23 am | Permalink

    power supply…

    i have the Pentium D 820 its good but the core 2 duos are much much faster!

    i can make

    Amd X2 5200 +
    1gb DDR2 667
    Mobo
    Case
    ATI Radeon X1950 GT
    PSU

    for under $650

    (will pwn the specs listed)

    [Edit by J2] - The Case has a 380 W PSU…again…read the article

  8. Posted February 28, 2007 at 4:29 am | Permalink

    Ooops you did it again !!
    NiCE try man ..
    Looks cool for Windows Vista..
    Sure it will give a good result

  9. Posted February 28, 2007 at 4:39 am | Permalink

    I would personally always suggest Amd-Ati-Asus ;)

  10. Posted February 28, 2007 at 5:12 am | Permalink

    How hard is actually process of putting together these components? Does it require specialist skills and tools?

  11. Posted February 28, 2007 at 5:23 am | Permalink

    Good on you for putting that together. There are soooo many misconceptions about Vista out there, even from people who have never used it or even laid eyes on it.

    [Edit by J2] - Thats exactly why I wrote this article. Thanks!

  12. Posted February 28, 2007 at 5:52 am | Permalink

    Very interesting! Thanks for posting.

  13. Posted February 28, 2007 at 5:53 am | Permalink

    “SATA300. 16MB. 7200RPM.” isn’t that a little bit small? or was this a typo?

    sorry

    GB101

  14. Posted February 28, 2007 at 7:58 am | Permalink

    vista seems to be rather popular with people from this part of the world. over here in asia, vista has been overly critiqued for its unstability.

    regards,
    The Pandora Effect.

  15. Posted February 28, 2007 at 8:10 am | Permalink

    You might want to re-think that case and that power supply.

  16. Posted February 28, 2007 at 8:25 am | Permalink

    Maybe if you went more into detail of why you chose each individual part and/or the actual process of building the machine, as your post title says “How to build…” not just ‘What parts to use…’…..

    Just my $0.02

    Thanks for the part tip off though :).

  17. Posted February 28, 2007 at 11:02 am | Permalink

    Great article. I would love to see a real example of a budget Vista PC. Knowing me, I’ll mess up building my own PC.

  18. Posted February 28, 2007 at 11:26 am | Permalink

    Why the hell would I want a PC with Vista?

  19. Posted February 28, 2007 at 1:30 pm | Permalink

    gee only another $400 to install the OS

    [Edit by J2] - Damn it people! Read the article! Vista Home Premium is $115 OEM. Business Premium is $145 and Ultimate is $195!

  20. J. Gould
    Posted February 28, 2007 at 2:52 pm | Permalink

    I agree with all your choices with the possible exception of the WD drives. I had 4 of them in a NAS, and found them to run very hot, So hot in fact that I ended up replacing them with 4 seagate 320 gb 300 mb/sec drives. These are running at last 15 to 20 degrees cooler in the same environment.

  21. Posted February 28, 2007 at 4:25 pm | Permalink

    But you forgot the kicker: $250 for the OS.

    <-read the damn article…$115 for Vista Home Premium

  22. iDIYcomputers
    Posted February 28, 2007 at 6:59 pm | Permalink

    Nice try!
    personally, I prefer Athlon X2 for maybe a bit more $$, but performs much better than P4 8XXs.

    With Vista you need double the amount of money spent for ram while you only get the same performance as you would have on win XP. With win XP, you could get a pc to perform smoothly on normal tasks with 1G ram and an INTEGRATED graphics card (no high end encoding, 3D and games and stuff, of course!). Think of the $$$ you save with keeping XP for the time being!

    Vienna would be out by 2009 and Vista (reminds me of Windows ME…). I would just use XP for another two years. By then prices of 2G ram would have lowered and should (hopefully) be equally as good for Vienna.

    PS. may have gone a bit off topic about Vista, but just my 2 percent :)

  23. David
    Posted February 28, 2007 at 8:28 pm | Permalink

    Argh. This is a little bit frustrating. I think you did a decent job of outlining your objective, what you used and tells us everything we need to know. However, I’m used to building computers, so I can look at these parts and see a half-decent PC, whereas less experienced users might have a harder time understanding this, but I don’t think that was your point.

  24. Matt HENDERSON
    Posted February 28, 2007 at 8:57 pm | Permalink

    I just really want to build a great gaming computer with all the speed, graphics, and sound as those 6000-8000 models out there(alienware/the new dell and gateways) I have replaced boards and added memory before but never build a computer from the ground up (os, drivers etc) there has to be a way to get me surfing and playing for less than these corporate giants anyone who can help please email me at sillycracker6288@yahoo.com

  25. Dell User
    Posted February 28, 2007 at 8:58 pm | Permalink

    Or just buy one… I have a Dell w/ 3.0Ghz Dual-core Pentium, 1GB RAM, 128MB ATI card… ~$660, including Vista Business, Aero runs fine.

  26. soundchaser
    Posted March 1, 2007 at 1:05 am | Permalink

    @GrayBags101

    it says the drive is 250GB, on the blue hyperlinked text. the 16MB refers to the cache size.

  27. Anthony Sager
    Posted March 1, 2007 at 1:46 am | Permalink

    I built a $500 rig on vista launch day with:

    AMD 3200+ AM2 & Motherboard w/ raid pcix16 and 7.1 audio etc. combo for $89
    1 gb DDR2 800 ram $79
    Philips DVD+-RW $39
    WD SATA HD 250GB $99
    NVIDIA 7300GT 256MB $79
    CASE w/ 450 watt power supply $49

    Total = $434 (way better than your build spec and price runs vista like a dream vista rating of 4.5)

    got vista for $110 at frys oem

  28. Achiron
    Posted March 1, 2007 at 2:10 am | Permalink

    hmmm, did you checked all the price’s in deal ram?

    btw, will it run supreme commander and the next farcry?

  29. Art
    Posted March 1, 2007 at 3:46 am | Permalink

    Very nice. I found your article linked on Lifehacker. Your traffic ought to be going through the roof.

    I try to do the same thing for people I know who are computer shopping - educate them, show them that a PC needn’t cost an arm and a leg.

    Sorry for the abuse you’ve gotten in the comments. Reading seems to be a lost art.

  30. Jason
    Posted March 1, 2007 at 7:13 am | Permalink

    Thanks for writing the article. Well done. I’m also sorry for all the ID 10 T s out there. Learn to read people. Don’t just skim.

  31. Posted March 1, 2007 at 7:07 pm | Permalink

    Hey I tried a mvp asus board ( 939 a64 3200 ) for home premium and its runs fine. THe onboard 6150 is ok too. teh big thing was getting 1 gig ram. 512 was pretty choppy.
    Does anyone do cheap am2 nf4 igp boards? they might be a cheaper option.

  32. garfield
    Posted March 2, 2007 at 5:34 am | Permalink

    Where can you get a motherboard/AMD 3200+ AM2 PCI-16X combo for $89?

    You did not provide a link.

  33. Anthony Sager
    Posted March 2, 2007 at 12:28 pm | Permalink

    “Where can you get an AMD 3200 AM2 + MOBO pci-x16 combo for $89″

    Any fry’s electronics. they always have great deals.

    ECS makes cheap mobos that run well their am2 works flawless. email me if you have more q’s

    and it runs all of amd’s am2 processesors from sempron to amd fx-2

  34. Garfield
    Posted March 2, 2007 at 3:04 pm | Permalink

    I went to http://frys.com/ and i did not see any great motherboard/CPU deal.

    you did not leave ur email address.

  35. firehawk
    Posted March 2, 2007 at 4:01 pm | Permalink

    Best bang for the buck I’ve found was the Mac Mini. $599. Doesn’t burn DVDs though. But it’s much smaller, much quieter, comes with bluetooth and WLAN, and runs Vista Aero Glass like butter. Plus it comes with an extra OS (MacOS) if you want to dual boot.

  36. dennis george
    Posted March 5, 2007 at 12:41 am | Permalink

    how is your performance on your office pc with the FX5200? are you using the stock drivers, or forceware version 96.85? that seems to be latest version which supports this card..

    im also running a ~4 year old system. athlon xp 1800+, 1GB ram, fx5200, raptor HD, nforce2 mobo (the 7nnxp).

    i have to say, yea sure aero glass works for me, but dear God the performance hurts me deep. for one, nvidia’s driver support is DISMAL! they dont support my nforce2 period, and support ends at 96.85 for my fx5200. i had to disable the nforce NIC, because i was getting dropped packets left and right. using the onboard intel gbit nic now with the latest drivers from intel. seems to be working better, but for whatever reason… aol im 5.9 and earlier still just refuses to stay connected for longer than 10 minutes.. whats up with this!

    the amount of memory aero consumes is scary. to do anything meaningful such as watch video, i have to disable it.. i like aero though, so i resort to turning it on and off now. even with it on though, i must disable transparency to keep ram usage somewhat sane. with it off, i really wish i could just use my old 3rd party xp themes again… (deviantart.com rocks!)

    the stock fx5200 drivers were awful for me, but the forceware drivers arent actually much better. i run a dual monitor setup and have now started noticing that if i leave the computer for a while and come back, every so often i wont get any display.. i have to vnc in from another machine, change resolutions or disable/enable the secondary display to get anything on screen. this is so incredibly annoying!

    its rather pathetic in my opinion that a company who’s entire reputation is grounded on their driver support has dropped the ball so miserably with this. here’s to hoping this sad situation will change soon.

    i also had to disable many services and features on vista to get somewhat manageble performance. the sidebar was first to go, thinking about disabling windows search now too. quite unfortunate.. there are others like these too.

    performance was wonderful under xp, im thinking about switching back but more so hoping things can be improved. whats your advice, and can you offer any tips to improve performance for users with older systems like us?

  37. Posted March 6, 2007 at 5:41 pm | Permalink

    interesting….i digg it….

  38. Posted July 24, 2007 at 8:20 am | Permalink

    Sorry to disappoint you, but I did not plagiarize your article as you’ve accused me in the comments on my post. By coincidence we both wrote very similar posts a week apart, but the difference is I had the post on my todo list for 3 months before I got around to writing it. And if you look into the details: 1) all my parts are from NewEgg and different than yours, and 2) The system I configured cost almost $50 less.

  39. Matilda.cs
    Posted December 5, 2007 at 3:43 pm | Permalink

    wow great article.
    You showed everyone how to build a crap PC.
    Lets be fair, anyone with any interest in building a PC will either be enthusiasts, gamers, or novices.
    I know that sounds a bit obvious, but…
    I am an enthusiast gamer and would not be able to run many games on your system.
    I only bought Vista for DX10 and your system could not run Crysis, Bioshock, CS:S, Assasin’s, etc etc etc… And Alan Wake isn’t even out yet.

    If anyone is reading this thinking “Wow I could build a gaming PC, or enthusiast PC for $500″ you are wrong.

    Very wrong.

    The only person who could use this PC daily would be Surfers or teenage girls bitching on myspace.

    In my honest opinion, if you have $500 to buy a PC, buy a system, don’t make one.

    If you have 2 or 3 times that amount, want something a bit sexier and something to be proud of, while playing all the fourth coming games… Only then should you build.

    My specs:

    Antec 900 case
    Corsair HX620w
    4x 1gb Crucial Ballistix @ 8500
    Zalman CNPS 9700 led
    QX660 cpu
    WD 250GB HDD
    XFX Geforce 8800 GTX XXX
    Logitech G15 Keyboard
    Logitech G5 Mouse
    and a new QPad XT-R Gamin Pad.

    I rates 12,500 on 3DMark06 yet Vista uses 30+% of RAM, PERMANENTLY.

    I’m not saying your article is rubbish, it’s not. It shows how Vista doesnt have to be expensive
    But readers, don’t take the advice of this guy if you want to buy something that you will benefit from. The above system will be slow. It will hang. You will NOT be able to play much more than CS on it. Not with the resources vista will steal from you.

    Also, why have Vista, I use Linux on my other PC, it has better effects than Vista, its prettier, you can run windows programs, its free, no viruses… etc… etc…

    Any who, I must fight some bad guys in Zero G now. Night

    x

20 Trackbacks

  1. [...] For everyone out there claiming that you need a very high-end PC to run Windows Vista, this article shows that you don’t need to break the bank to enjoy Vista to its fullestread more | digg story These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]

  2. [...] For everyone out there claiming that you need a very high-end PC to run Windows Vista, this article shows that you don’t need to break the bank to enjoy Vista to its fullestread more | digg story [...]

  3. [...] February 28, 2007How to build an inexpensive and powerful Vista PC (around $500) For everyone out there claiming that you need a very high-end PC to run Windows Vista, this article shows that you don’t need to break the bank to enjoy Vista to its fullestread more | digg story Filed under Technology updates by manoj [...]

  4. [...] How to Build an inexpensive Vista PC (Aero Enabled) at J2s site - it is nice! [...]

  5. By Blog Mirrors » Build your own Vista PC on the cheap on February 28, 2007 at 3:40 pm

    [...] How to Build an inexpensive Vista PC (Aero Enabled) [...]

  6. By links for 2007-03-01 « Bloggitation on February 28, 2007 at 5:21 pm

    [...] How to Build an inexpensive Vista PC (Aero Enabled) at J2s site - it is nice! (tags: hardware windows) [...]

  7. [...] How to Build an inexpensive Vista PC (Aero Enabled) [JJMelo] [...]

  8. By Portable Gadget on February 28, 2007 at 7:57 pm

    [...] How to Build an inexpensive Vista PC (Aero Enabled) [JJMelo] [...]

  9. [...] From looking at the parts list, he uses some pretty decent—but not spectacular parts—and actually manages to get 2GB of RAM in there. It’s not going to win any speed races, but this thing costs less than a PS3. – Jason Chen How to Build an inexpensive Vista PC (Aero Enabled) [JJMelo] [...]

  10. [...] How to Build an inexpensive Vista PC (Aero Enabled) [JJMelo] [...]

  11. [...] | How to Build an inexpensive Vista PC (Aero Enabled) Enviar a un amigo por E-mail | URI para TrackBack. Categoria:Windows [...]

  12. By Geekularity » links for 2007-03-02 on March 2, 2007 at 1:27 am

    [...] How to Build an inexpensive Vista PC (Aero Enabled) - J2s site - it is nice! (tags: hardware vista howto) [...]

  13. [...] How to Build an inexpensive Vista PC (Aero Enabled) [J2s site] [...]

  14. [...] How to Build an inexpensive Vista PC (Aero Enabled) at J2s site - it is nice! (tags: hardware Vista howto computer windows PC build) [...]

  15. [...] 5. How to build a powerful and cheap Vista PC (around $500) I’ve tried building a PC cheaper than this at Newegg and other stores but nothing can beat what this guy pulled together for $538.01. [...]

  16. [...] How to Build an inexpensive Vista PC (aero enabled) [...]

  17. [...] course, PC geeks will always want to build their own, and this site has a great article on building an inexpensive Vista PC (it still runs [...]

  18. By Build a Vista PC for around $500 revisited. on July 23, 2007 at 8:19 pm

    [...] wrote the original article about how to build a Vista enabled PC with Aero enabled back in February and it proved to be hot [...]

  19. By JJMELO.com » More clear objectives for this blog on January 15, 2008 at 4:27 am

    [...] articles written here, and seeing as I still get somes hits due to my IT articles (namely the $500 Vista PC one written 11 months ago), I will start posting mostly IT related articles. As an IT consultant, [...]

  20. [...] a year ago I wrote a pretty successful article (it got Dugg over 1000 times and I still get traffic via search engines) and  I’ve decided [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*